Who actually wants your data?
Most people's realistic threats are boring, and that is useful to know. This worksheet helps you name them. Everything on this page runs in your browser: the script behind it contains no network code at all, so ticking boxes never leaves the page, which you can verify by reading it. With JavaScript off, the whole worksheet still reads as a printable paper checklist.
Who could realistically want your data
Tick what applies to your life, not what a spy film says. The notes are honest about likelihood; grounding for the framing is in the threat model, honestly and what your AI cloud can and cannot see.
What you actually store
The point of this step is scope: an adversary only matters where it overlaps with data you really keep.
What protects against which threat
Seven ordinary protections against the seven adversaries above. "Helps" means it substantially blocks that adversary; "partial" means it raises the cost without closing the door; "does not help" is printed where that is the honest answer.
| Protection | Casual snooping | Partner or family | Device thief | Data brokers | Breach criminals | Employer (managed device) | Legal process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen lock with short auto-lock | helps | partial | helps | does not help | does not help | does not help | partial |
| Full-disk encryption | does not help | does not help | helps | does not help | does not help | does not help | partial |
| Unique passwords in a manager | does not help | partial | partial | does not help | helps | does not help | does not help |
| Two-factor authentication | does not help | partial | partial | does not help | helps | does not help | does not help |
| End-to-end encrypted apps | does not help | does not help | partial | helps | partial | partial | partial |
| Breach-alert monitoring | does not help | does not help | does not help | does not help | helps | does not help | does not help |
| Limiting what you hand to free services | does not help | does not help | does not help | helps | partial | does not help | partial |
Reasoning behind the sharper cells: a screen lock and full-disk encryption do nothing once a device is in use and unlocked, which is exactly when snooping happens. Nothing on this list beats an employer's device administration; the realistic protection there is separation, not software. And against legal process, encryption narrows what a provider can hand over to metadata and to whatever you stored unencrypted elsewhere; it does not make the process go away.
What your picks add up to
Tick at least one adversary in step 1 to build a summary. Adding step 2 makes it specific to what you store.
Printing keeps the worksheet and this summary and drops the site chrome. Nothing is saved: reloading the page clears every box.
Where Violet does not help
We build an end-to-end encrypted AI companion, so it is fair to ask where that fits this worksheet. Honest answer: encryption of data at rest covers some rows above and not others, and Violet specifically does not protect against:
- A compromised or unlocked device. Anything that reads your screen or your device's plaintext sees what you see, encryption or not.
- Anyone who learns your passphrase. In a design with no reset flow, the passphrase is the entire wall.
- A weak passphrase behind strong key derivation. Key stretching slows guessing; it cannot rescue "violet123".
- Sync metadata. A sync server necessarily sees that encrypted envelopes exist, when they move, and how large they are, even when it cannot read one byte inside.
- Anything you store in other services. Your email, your cloud photos, and your chat apps keep their own threat models.
- And the plainest one: Violet is pre-launch. Today it protects nothing, because it is not in your hands yet.
The full architecture, stated without marketing: how end-to-end encryption protects personal AI data and what your AI cloud can and cannot see.